| |
The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall
cause him to receive efficient full-time education suitable -
(a) to his age, ability and aptitude, and
(b) to any special educational needs he may have, either by regular
attendance at school or otherwise.
Education Act 1996, section 7 (emphasis added) |
|
Looking at Section 7 of the 1996 Act, this is essentially
what it says:
- If you have a school-age child, you must see that (s)he is educated.
- You can delegate this duty to a school, or you can carry it
out yourself.
- In any case, the education provided must be efficient and full-time.
- It must be suitable to the child’s age, ability and aptitude.
- If your child has special educational needs, it must cater
for them.
What exactly does this mean? Nowhere in the 1996 Act is the term
education defined. Most of the other terminology in s 7 is not defined
either. For many of these expressions our only source of guidance
is
an appeal case which was heard at Worcester Crown Court in 1981
(Harrison & Harrison v Stevenson). In this case the judge defined
education as ‘the development of mental powers and character
and the acquisition of knowledge through the imparting of skills
and learning by systematic instruction’. He went on to describe
an efficient system of education as one which ‘achieves that
which it sets out to achieve’. Finally, he defined education
as suitable if it is such as
1. to prepare the children for life in modern civilised society;
and
2. to enable them to achieve their full potential.
This definition is a very general one and could encompass a variety
of educational styles and methods. Education Otherwise defends the
right of families to take direct responsibility for their children’s
education regardless of the particular approach they wish to adopt.
But for all its broadness, the judge’s definition does set
limits. There are some parents who, for whatever reason, see home
education as a means of separating their children from society at
large. In taking this view they may fail to meet the first of these
criteria, and EO would find it difficult to support them in any
conflict with the authorities.
With respect to the second criterion, critics sometimes claim that
children are denied opportunities by being kept away from school.
But many parents choose to educate their children at home precisely
because they feel they are giving them more freedom, not less, to
become everything they are capable of becoming, and thereby to improve
the quality of society for everyone.
The terms school-age, full-time and special educational needs will
be discussed below. Apart from this, the important thing to know
is that this is all there is to be said about your duty. Provided
your child is not a registered pupil at a school (see page 49),
you are bound by no other constraints. In particular:
- You don’t need permission to educate ‘otherwise’.
- You don’t have to tell the LEA (but see page 48 on this
point).
- You don’t have to have premises equipped to any particular
standard.
- You don’t have to be a qualified teacher.
- You don’t have to cover the same syllabus as the school.
- You don’t have to follow the National Curriculum (see
page 90).
- You don’t have to plan your curriculum in advance at
all.
- You don’t have to keep to school hours, days or terms.
- You don’t need a fixed timetable.
- You don’t have to give formal school-type lessons in
a classroom.
You may well choose to do any or all of these things, but you don’t
have to. You need to be able to show, if required, that you are
serious about home-based education and that you are offering your
child a reasonably wide range of appropriate opportunities (some
of which may well be declined!). If your child is happy, healthy,
and is responding well to what you are providing, the chances are
that your educational arrangements are ‘suitable’. If
(s)he is bored, resistant, frustrated or badly behaved, you may
need to think again.
In order to be efficient, your education does not have to cover
the same syllabus as the equivalent education being offered in school,
nor does it have to meet any hypothetical standard set by any school
or the authority (Bevan v Shears, 1911, 2KB 936). So long as it
is full-time, education can take place anywhere and at any time.
So long as it is suitable for your child, it can take any form.
As for the definition of ‘efficient education’ quoted
above, it has been wryly pointed out that if all education had to
achieve what it set out to achieve, every child who failed to benefit
from school would put their parents in breach of the law! |
If you have a ‘school-age’ child, s 7 of
the 1996 Act says you must see that (s)he is educated. But if the
child is a registered pupil at a school, you have an extra duty under
s 444 to make sure (s)he attends regularly. This is the section used
against truancy. Subject to certain statutory excuses,
if you fail in this duty you are guilty of a criminal offence and
may be taken to court. (See also page 52 for other steps the LEA may
take.) Technically it makes no difference in this situation whether
or not you are providing education out of school.
What is a registered pupil at a school? The registration of pupils
is provided for by the Education (Pupil Registration) Regulations
1995 (S.I. 1995/2089). Regulation 5 requires schools to keep admission
and attendance registers. A child whose name is on the school admission
register is a registered pupil. The presence or absence at school
of registered pupils is recorded in the attendance register. A child
will not be registered simply because you have put their name down
for a school, but as soon as you actually send them there you can
assume that they are. At this point your duty to secure regular
attendance begins. (But note that it only applies if your child
is of ‘compulsory school age’. So if you have a four-year-old
at school, you are not committed to sending them regularly and can
withdraw them without formality. See page 45.)
If you are withdrawing your child from school it’s important
to see that (s)he is deregistered. The grounds on which a pupil’s
name must be deleted from the admission register are listed in regulation
9. Under regulation 9(1)(c), a ‘school-age’ pupil’s
name is to be deleted from the admission register if:
... he has ceased to attend the school and the proprietor has received
written notification from the parent that the pupil is receiving
education otherwise than at school.
This means you need to write to the school explaining clearly that
you are educating the child at home. (Note the tense. It’s
important to make it clear that home education is already taking
place. See page 76 for a specimen letter.) On receiving your letter
the school must take the child’s name off the register. It
is also obliged (under regulation 13(3)) to inform the LEA within
two weeks of doing so. |
| Some LEAs are more demanding than others. Many merely
wish to reassure themselves that you are sane and reasonable and are
attempting to provide some kind of coherent education rather than
neglecting your children or making use of their labour. Others may
take a much closer interest in your provision. Some may enquire about
your arrangements once and then show no further concern; some may
carry out checks at infrequent intervals; others will see it as their
duty to monitor home education in a routine, ongoing way. The validity
of this last view is by no means clear.
As a parent you must see that your child is properly educated,
and the LEA may ask you to show that you are doing this. Sometimes
LEAs may make specific demands, either by word of mouth or in writing;
but any such demand is unlikely in itself to have the force of law
(see pages 44 and 109). Often you may be happy to comply; but if
you aren’t, the LEA should not insist. Your best course is
to treat such demands as suggestions only. If you don’t like
them, you should explain why and propose a constructive alternative.
This applies on a number of levels. Firstly, the LEA may ask you
to provide specific things, such as history instruction or a computer.
If you feel that what they are asking for is not essential to a
suitable programme of education for your child, you may wish to
point this out. Secondly they may ask you to produce specific documentation,
such as lesson plans or timetables. If you feel these are not relevant
to your style of education, you may wish to explain. Thirdly (although
in a sense this really comes first), they may ask you to provide
evidence of your arrangements by specific means, such as written
reports or home visits. If you prefer to provide the information
in some other way, you may wish to negotiate. |